Which district are you running for?

Heidi Wegleitner (D2): District 2

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Heidi Wegleitner (D2): The County has been a leader with the Dane County Housing Initiative in convening annual summits, funding and facilitating the Regional Housing Strategy work, providing technical assistance to municipalities, and developing and growing its Affordable Housing Fund and creating the Fair Chance Housing Fund and Safe Housing for Farmworkers initiative. The County needs to continue to elevate its leadership role, however, because the housing needs are enormous and there is so much more to be done. The County should focus its leadership and priority for those with the most housing barriers and who are intersecting with other county-run systems, including human services and our criminal legal system. I strongly support bonding by the DCHA to address the gap for the most severely cost burdened households in Dane County. I would personally favor a more ambitious goal to actually meet the need. It’s one thing to raise revenue to fund the creation of new housing but the property doesn’t run itself. We also need an operator or manager of the new properties. Unfortunately, we have a lack of quality property managers and housing providers in our community, particularly those serving low-income people, are currently overwhelmed managing their existing programs. Additional outside resources and policy support would be helpful in addressing this workforce capacity problem. Ideally, we’d have more resident-operated housing to foster resident voice in rulemaking and enforcement, but creating those models also requires training and support that is currently lacking.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Heidi Wegleitner (D2): The county could give greater weight to preferences for long term and permanent affordability. I believe there is a 99-year affordability requirement for The Valor, an affordable housing project in my district. This was a redevelopment project I initiated when we decided not to use the old Messner building site for the comprehensive day resource center. The additional requirements in the extended affordability term are not as strong as in the initial affordability restrictions, though. I am inspired by the growth of the Madison Area Community Land Trust and will advocate for the County to prioritize permanent affordability. It’s frustrating to see us lose affordability when land use restrictions expire.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Heidi Wegleitner (D2): People with low incomes live throughout my district. The Salvation Army women’s shelter (and former and future family shelter) is in my district and I expect many of the people who use that facility face income barriers related to housing access. There is CDA housing in the Tenney Lapham and James Madison Park area, Porchlight and Housing Initiatives scattered site housing in multiple neighborhoods in my district, and rapid rehousing program participants in the Eken Park neighborhood. The Breese Apartments serves low-income residents in project-based section 8 voucher supported tenants. I have led efforts to create and/or fund multiple low-income housing projects in my district, including The Valor, The Shield, and the new redevelopment project of St. John’s Lutheran Church. District 2 is a high opportunity area which is well-served by transit, neighborhood schools, grocery stores, social services, and contains many employment opportunities. It is also rapidly gentrifying and we need to be mindful of the impact redevelopment has on driving up the cost of housing (which used to be naturally occurring affordable housing NOAH) nearby as well as increasing rates of eviction judgments. (See Dr. Revel Sims research) I think the City and County should play a more aggressive role in land acquisition in high opportunity districts like mine so we can promote equitable development through permanent affordability and mitigate adverse redevelopment impacts to existing low income renters in the area.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Heidi Wegleitner (D2): It’s no secret to anyone involved in homeless services provision and advocacy that we need significantly more permanent supportive housing options for people experiencing homelessness in shelter and those who are unsheltered. I understand the City has moved away from large scale PSH projects in favor of scattered site models. I think the larger scale projects is still possible with high-quality property management and independent and skilled supportive services providers. We need a range of options, though. I have led efforts to provide county funding for Occupy Madison to support its second and third tiny house villages. I also support increasing the number of PSH units in our city and county funded affordable housing projects. It is important that there are solid supportive services plans, though, and that eviction is only used as a last resort. Key to increasing our PSH units will be to address the workforce crisis in homeless services. We need to support our providers in increasing wages to be able to recruit and retain highly qualified staff. This is hard work and the workers need to be compensated fairly. I am in communication with the Purchase of Services leadership group and would like to come up with a plan to address the inadequate compensation throughout the human services sector. I would also strongly support workers’ efforts to organize a union to collectively advocate for better pay and working conditions.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Heidi Wegleitner (D2): I have served on the Specialized Transportation Committee for some time and the County could do a much better job of promoting existing transportation options for low-income people, seniors, and people with disabilities. We could also contribute more revenue to these programs that are mostly funded by the state and the feds. Throughout my tenure, I have been a strong advocate for the expansion of low-income bus passes and free bus passes for youth and people experiencing homelessness. Madison’s City County Schools Collaborative Committee, which I co-chair, considering how to support safer routes to schools for families in MMSD. I support dedicating revenue from our county’s vehicle registration fee to transit equity initiatives. I also support redirecting road and parking lot spending to improving public transit, biking, and pedestrian infrastructure. I am hopeful that fairer maps and a new legislature will facilitate enabling legislation for the creation of a Regional Transit Authority in Dane County to raise revenue and plan and develop regional transit.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Heidi Wegleitner (D2): There is probably nothing more frustrating in my daily work as a tenants’ rights attorney in legal aid than representing people who have so little control over the quality of life in their home due to the imbalance of power between a landlord and tenant. Organizing can change that power dynamic and I am in strong support of resident and tenant organizing. In the 2024 county budget, I championed a budget amendment for about $68,000 to support tenant organizing and capacity building initiatives in at-risk housing projects. While this is a small amount, I think the initiative itself is significant because it is a commitment to building power among people most impacted. This is necessary for systems and structural change. It is important to not just create the models and compose boards of residents, but also make sure they are supported in being successful. This might require legal services or other professional services, meeting space, anti-retaliation enforcement, etc. We could require more of our county funded developments, but we need to be prepared to meet the need for technical and other support.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Richard Brown (D4): District 4

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Richard Brown (D4): In the realm of community planning and housing, the voices of county residents hold immense importance. Having served as a Commissioner for the Dane County Housing Authority for five years, I have witnessed firsthand the pivotal role that county governance plays in shaping land use, zoning regulations, and policies that impact housing. From my tenure as the Treasurer of the Dane County Housing Authority, I understand the intricate blend of financing, lending, and county tax policies essential for the successful development and maintenance of housing infrastructure.

The county’s involvement in housing finance encompasses various interconnected aspects, ranging from providing direct assistance to residents and supporting developers and community organizations to formulating tax policies and identifying revenue sources. As we navigate the complexities of housing support systems, it becomes evident that strategic investments are crucial to address housing challenges effectively. I stand in support of the Housing Authority’s upcoming initiatives, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that includes creating single-family housing options and ownership opportunities for marginalized communities over the next decade.

In advocating for inclusive and sustainable housing solutions, it is imperative to prioritize reducing density and promoting diverse housing options that cater to the needs of all residents, especially the underserved and disenfranchised. By aligning county efforts with the goal of fostering equitable access to housing, we can collectively work towards building resilient communities that thrive on the foundation of inclusivity and empowerment.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Richard Brown (D4): As a prospective County Board Supervisor in the 4th District, I am committed to championing initiatives that foster sustainable affordability in Dane County. To achieve this, I propose a multifaceted approach that prioritizes the creation of mixed-income communities. By promoting social integration and economic diversity, we can cultivate inclusive neighborhoods that benefit all residents, regardless of their financial background.

One key aspect of my vision involves the establishment of a dedicated fund to provide subsidies for developers who pledge to maintain long-term affordability in their projects. Additionally, offering low-interest loans and grants to developers will help offset the costs associated with ensuring housing remains affordable for all. By taking these proactive steps, we can safeguard against gentrification and prioritize the well-being of our community members.

Furthermore, I advocate for the creation of a housing stabilization fund aimed at assisting residents at risk of displacement due to escalating living expenses. This initiative will serve as a safety net, ensuring that individuals and families can remain in their homes and communities even as economic conditions fluctuate. Together, by implementing these strategies, we can work towards a more equitable and sustainable future for Dane County.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Richard Brown (D4): In my neighborhood, significant changes are on the horizon as we prepare to replace the bus hub with a new affordable housing project. While I am a proponent of expanding housing options, I believe it is crucial to prioritize affordable single-family homes that can empower individuals to transition from lower-class to middle-class status through homeownership. As we look towards the future, I propose utilizing the county-owned land on Badger Road as a potential site for constructing such housing, emphasizing the importance of sustainable and inclusive community development.

Drawing from past experiences, such as the Tree Lane project, we must be mindful of the potential strain that large-scale affordable rental units can place on our resources, including law enforcement and housing providers. By focusing on creating opportunities for sustainable homeownership, we can not only address the housing needs of our community but also foster a sense of stability and pride among residents. Let us work together to shape a future where affordable housing is not just a necessity but a means of uplifting individuals and families towards a brighter tomorrow.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Richard Brown (D4): Creating sustainable housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and those utilizing shelters in Dane County requires a multifaceted approach. By fostering collaboration with local landlords, we can establish affordable housing options tailored to those transitioning out of shelters. Additionally, repurposing unused buildings into transitional housing facilities can offer a temporary yet crucial stepping stone towards stable housing.

Financial literacy workshops play a pivotal role in empowering individuals to maintain housing stability. Partnering with employers to provide job training and employment opportunities not only enhances financial independence but also fosters a sense of purpose. Furthermore, the establishment of a Housing Navigation Center can streamline the housing search process, ensuring quicker access to secure housing.

Incorporating mental health and substance abuse counseling services within the housing support program is essential for holistic well-being. Offering incentives to property owners who accommodate individuals transitioning out of shelters can incentivize community participation. By implementing these innovative strategies, Dane County can pave the way for sustainable, long-term housing solutions for all its residents in need.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Richard Brown (D4): For the past 8 years, I have overseen the Transportation Ministry at my church, dedicated to assisting seniors who are unable to drive. As a passionate supporter of seniors’ well-being, I recognize the importance of addressing their distinct needs and obstacles. One key area of focus for me is the enhancement of transportation services. It is common for seniors to encounter mobility issues or lack the ability to operate a vehicle. To promote their autonomy and community engagement, my primary goal is to broaden transportation choices, including public transit and services tailored for seniors. By striving to improve transportation accessibility, we aim to empower seniors to sustain their active lifestyles and connections with their communities and loved ones. No senior should experience isolation or confinement due to transportation challenges. Through the provision of reliable and convenient transportation alternatives, we can enable them to lead enriching and self-reliant lives.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Richard Brown (D4): As a candidate for County Board Supervisor, my vision is centered on fostering a more just and sustainable community for all residents. A key aspect of my plan involves establishing a housing equity fund to offer vital assistance in accessing and maintaining affordable housing. Through the implementation of a “Rent-to-Own” program, we can empower renters to move towards homeownership, promoting stability and a sense of pride in ownership. It is crucial to collaborate with developers to prioritize affordable housing units in new construction projects to tackle the urgent issue of housing affordability. Providing legal aid and mediation services to residents facing housing difficulties ensures that everyone has access to equitable solutions. A public awareness campaign will educate residents on their housing rights and choices, enabling them to make informed decisions. By granting property tax relief to residents in affordable housing units, we can ease financial burdens and encourage lasting stability in our community. Through these initiatives and partnerships, we can strive towards a future where every individual has a secure and affordable place to call home. I invite you to join me in creating a more resilient and inclusive community for all.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Cecely Castillo (D7): District 7

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Cecely Castillo (D7): One of the reasons I joined the county board was to participate in the work of finding housing solutions in our community. During my time on the board I have voted in support of housing measures and will continue to do so.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Cecely Castillo (D7): Dane County should continue to invest in affordable housing leveraging competitive tax credits. The community land trusts model is something we should explore and I’m open to learning the pros and cons of other models.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Cecely Castillo (D7): I do support building housing for low-income people in District 7 and we should focus on pairing these developments with our transportation corridors.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Cecely Castillo (D7): We must take a comprehensive view of this issue and ensure that housing options for unsheltered individuals are considered with proximity to necessary services. These include public transportation, schools, employment, and healthcare.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Cecely Castillo (D7): Dane county must continue to invest in multimodal transportation with a strategic plan that considers population growth.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Cecely Castillo (D7): Encourage inclusion of tenant inclusion in decision making in contracts with developers.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Jeffrey Glazer (D8): District 8

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Jeffrey Glazer (D8): The County is limited in the ways that it can help solve the housing problem, however the Housing Authority and Affordable Housing Development Fund have been regional leaders in funding the development of new housing. Funding and supporting new developments throughout Dane County that focus on affordability and workplace housing is a critical role for the County to continue this leadership. But, we need to be mindful of the tax burden placed on residents and, inevitably, it means understanding how housing ranks with other critical priorities in the county including health care services, social justice reforms, infrastructure, and economic development. A Housing Bond to address these issues at a much larger scale with more strategic planning would demonstrate this continued leadership.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Jeffrey Glazer (D8): In scoring opportunities presented to the County for use of the Affordable Housing Development funds, we should prioritize and score higher those projects that fundamentally incorporate permanent affordable housing. There is a lot of creativity to be had in community land trusts and cooperative housing and Dane County should be rewarding and incentivizing that kind of creativity to address housing issues.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Jeffrey Glazer (D8): My District comprises numerous affordable housing units, senior housing units, and worker housing - including duplexes and other smaller scale multi-family units. There have been multiple new housing developments in my District in the past few years. I think “affordable housing” is not just about building new housing, but ensuring that current workplace housing (rented homes, duplexes, and 4-flats) can remain affordable for working families, too. This means supporting workers with housing-adjacent services such as transportation and child care and providing incentives to developers and landlords to keep rents in a range that our service, agricultural, trade workers, and the others that comprise the bulk of Dane County’s workforce can continue to live here.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Jeffrey Glazer (D8): Dane County should increase its support to service providers addressing unsheltered individuals with evidence-based approaches to protection and re-housing. Moreover, we should look at models for reducing the cost associated with such services by looking into leading public-private partnerships, land bank/land trust, and cooperative models of service and housing that can address these issues in fundamentally different ways.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Jeffrey Glazer (D8): One creative solution that we have been seeing at the Public Works Committee through our Transportation Department is to prioritize traffic for surge use, multi-person commuting including busses, park-n-ride vans, and rideshare services. The County can also play an active role in advocating for rail service, improved bus services in the communities throughout the county, and encouraging and funding services that prioritize non-car and multi-rider transportation alternatives.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Jeffrey Glazer (D8): Democratic control of the institutions closest to us fosters community, resiliency, and health and mental welfare for those impacted. Cooperatives and syndicates are a great tool for ensuring that those impacted by the cooperative endeavor have a say in the impact. We should encourage this by prioritizing these factors when weighing the County’s support for projects.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Jay Brower (D13): District 13

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Jay Brower (D13): The County’s role is a few fold. First, to staff and properly fund the Department of Human Services Division of Housing Access and Affordability. Staff in this area worker under the oversight of the County Board and are responsible for the development of initiatives to address the housing crisis. Second, the County’s role is to allocate money for affordable housing to, even if proportionally small in the funding stack, help close the gap to see developments to completion (e.g., Bayview, St. John’s). In addition to oversight and funding, the County Board’s role is to serve as a conduit between the constituents we serve and county services to ensure that those seeking resources understand what public resources are available and how to avail themselves of those resource. I haven’t studied the proposed issuance of a $350 million dollar bond and its fiscal impact, however, from a value set perspective, yes, I am supportive of an approach consistent with this option.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Jay Brower (D13): One area listed above that the County has been pursuing in the acquisition of land for conservation is the creation of community land trusts to ensure that the purchased land will not be developed in ways unintended at the time of purchase. I see this as a viable way to create permanent affordability, and also an area where the County ought to develop consistent policy to ensure a legal structure that will achieve its desired outcome in perpetuity.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Jay Brower (D13): My district is dominated by high-value homes in the the Regent neighborhood along with campus-adjacent apartments, and high-value rentals in the Campus Area and South Campus neighborhoods. Students are in a special status when it comes to determinations of income-based measures of wealth. Setting that demographic aside, any clusters of low-income people are very difficult to identify given the unique composition of the district. Additionally, because of the high proportion of academic-year rental properties, the movement of people around and out of the district make it difficult to track income level measures in a consistent fashion.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Jay Brower (D13): The County needs to incentivize the development of denser housing models that increase affordability while providing spaces that are appropriate for single individuals.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Jay Brower (D13): The key development that the County must pursue is a change in state law that allows for the creation of a regional transportation authority. As Madison continues to grow, it is more imperative than ever to have accessible mass transit that can transport people from second and third ring communities into the city center. This is especially relevant for many healthcare workers, a proportion of which are paid exceedingly low wages, who are forced to pay exorbitant prices for parking. The County should also continue to pave additional miles of our bike paths to expand the functionality of our bike/walk infrastructure to both carry commuters and encourage outdoor activity.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Jay Brower (D13): As a union organizer, I am always in favor of collective bargaining. In housing specifically, power is substantially out of balance in the relationship between renters and landlords. Collective bargaining is the single most effective way to rebalance power. I would support the creation of model agreements and other assistance to ensure the smooth implementation and functioning of such agreement.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Travis Austin (D13): District 13

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Travis Austin (D13): I believe the Dane County government can and should play a greater role in addressing the affordability crisis in housing. While there is little the county can do to impact zoning regulations which remain the authority of municipalities, the county can provide far more resources and funds to address this issue. This should include an Affordable Housing Bond program among other support services to connect the residents of the county to housing. During my time on my local town board, I was heavily involved in addressing housing affordability for Dane County farm workers. Creative solutions are needed at all levels of government to address housing affordability.

Important considerations in the implementation of affordable housing funding are the location of the developments, how connected it is via transit or the walkability to sources of food, employment opportunities, and the other essential services people rely on. These factors should be the essential criteria in eligibility for county funds. We also need to further increase resources to the Tenant Resource Center and other local organizations connecting people to housing.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Travis Austin (D13): These long-term solutions like cooperative housing are very important, especially for the future of the student housing crisis that is top of mind for the residents of District 13. The county should incentivize these solutions with longer-term grant programs and permanent tax incentives to keep these vital resources in our communities and expand their reach. The recent displacement of the Zoe Bayliss co-op demonstrates how these long-term housing models are being forced out of the areas that need them most.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Travis Austin (D13): Porchlight’s N. Brooks location and the Veteran’s Transitional Housing Program are both located in District 13 and serve some of the lowest-income residents of the county. The work these programs do must have the county’s continued support.

District 13 primarily consists of UW-Madison students who are continuing to face increased housing pressure. The City of Madison’s zoning exception to allow for additional floors in new apartment buildings dedicated to low-income students is an amazing start to tackling the housing issues surrounding campus. However, most new housing built in and around District 13 is more luxury-style housing, with high amounts of square footage per bed and amenities that lead to overall higher baseline rents. This has led the “middle-class” students of District 13 to be the ones who are struggling the most with the housing situation. With their families making just enough so they don’t qualify for most aid programs, yet not enough to afford the exorbitant rents of new luxury housing. This skew towards luxury-style housing is present across the county. We need incentives for developers to build more basic and “no frills” style housing for Dane County with lower starting rents. In District 13, there are older apartment buildings that are likely being eyed for future redevelopment. Prioritizing non-luxury housing to replace these more affordable locations is a must.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Travis Austin (D13): Dane County needs a more coordinated approach between our health services and housing services to address the needs of the unsheltered. We need to increase the capacity and availability of inpatient mental health and substance abuse treatment programs to allow people to recover and become sober off the streets in a controlled and caring environment. Partnerships with local organizations and area healthcare providers will be essential.

The first priority in addressing single unsheltered individuals is providing people with a stable and controlled environment. Additionally, for those who are afflicted by addiction and untreated mental health needs, the first step in the path to permanent housing is to offer them opportunities at temporary recovery-focused accommodations. We also need to have adequate capacity for our temporary post-treatment and initial intake housing so people do not end up right back on the streets before they even get a chance to build themselves a support network. After that, we need a network of long-term housing across the county that gives people a stable home to build their lives. Compassion should always be a guiding principle in county policy.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Travis Austin (D13): Dane County can play an immense role in providing further connections between our municipalities. Dane County needs a regional transit authority to begin the task of connecting our outlying communities to the Madison area. The village of Oregon is looking to start its own transit system and likely other communities will follow suit. Working to provide connections to the broader Dane County area and decrease reliance on cars not only will better connect people but also help reduce the carbon emissions of the county that contribute to climate change.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Travis Austin (D13): State statute unfortunately bars municipal and county governments from nearly all forms of lease restrictions and rent control measures designed to protect tenants from abusive landlords. Dane County must continue to pressure State officials to repeal these restrictions that tie the hands of local governments around the state in addressing their housing needs. In the meantime, the county can provide property tax incentives to housing that provide a minimum standard of tenant rights.

We should also attempt to restrict how early leases can be signed to no more than 6 months by redefining a rental agreement under county ordinances. This primarily will help ease the burden of the student housing market, where the vast majority of housing is signed nearly 10 months in advance for the following academic year. This is not conducive to a competitive market, and with a guaranteed renter population of about 50,000 people near campus, there is no incentive to change.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Anthony Gray (D14): District 14

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Anthony Gray (D14): I think the County’s role is to create policy and financial incentives for the building of all housing, but most acutely, Affordable housing to address the current crises (That is going to get worse over the next 10 years). Yes. I would support the Bond issue.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Anthony Gray (D14): I think the Land Trust model is the most effective for maintaining long-term affordability. Many of the other tools can be and are gamed by developers.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Anthony Gray (D14): The most income oppressed area of my district is around the Raymond Road area.
Yes. I support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in my district. There is some (“NOAH”) Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing stock in my district that really should be renovated and updated. There is also some land along County Hwy. PD that could be used for new stock.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Anthony Gray (D14): This is a difficult issue, in as much as so many of our efforts in this area have been unsuccessful. Two of the most prominent permanent housing developments in the city are about to file bankruptcy with a clear plan for what is going to happen to those residents if/when they close. I have to say honestly I don’t know what the answer is. This is an area that I would have to rely on the advice and counsel of groups like the Affordable Housing Action Alliance (and others) for policy guidance.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Anthony Gray (D14): I think we have great biking trails. We need to incentivize developers to build walkable neighborhoods. We’re upgrading our city bussing system. In a perfect world, I’d love to see a light rail system running from Minneapolis - Madison - Milwaukee - Chicago.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Anthony Gray (D14): I have and do support all of these tools to promote resident control.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

April Kigeya (D15): District 15

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

April Kigeya (D15): Absolutely! That is one small step towards making housing attainable (not affordable) for all residents of Dane County

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

April Kigeya (D15): Dane County should partner with the state to increase the minimum wage to a living wage that is realistic and one that makes affording housing attainable.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

April Kigeya (D15): There isn’t one set location as many families are doubled up, living beyond their means with the mean to obtain payday loans for day to day necessities. I support building attainable housing but am not sure where that can be built that isn’t already taken

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

April Kigeya (D15): Funding, funding, funding. Funding for attainable housing needs to be a priority from the city, county and state. We all need to work in unison to make this a reality

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

April Kigeya (D15): We need to increase access to our bus transit system as well being rail transit to the city. Also, increasing the minimum wage as mentioned before will enable some to afford to commune

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

April Kigeya (D15): I believe we should not only support these efforts, but also put money behind creating these in terms of providing food during the meetings, childcare and transportation.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Rick Rose (D16): District 16

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Rick Rose (D16): This is a national crisis and Dane has the opportunity to break ground and be a leader in the country to show the way to true “affordable housing.” We must begin by all being on the same page: county leadership, stakeholders, residents. What defines “affordable” and then from there we set a consistent, fallback plan to get there with all participants having consensus along the way. To do so, I would strongly suppport the AHB with this common understanding from its launch to its completion.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Rick Rose (D16): I would support long-term affordability by looking at better models that go beyond what we are currently doing and seeing in Dane County. Think San Francisco and coop living. Think Montgomery County, MD where there is government owned housing where 30% of its apartments are reserved for people earning less than the area’s median income. We must think beyond horizontal single family homes. We must work on pay equity and equality.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Rick Rose (D16): Harmony and Meadowlands are in the forefront of bad planning in District 16. The County and City must collaborate on what defines housing for “low-income” and the rules we set for real estate developers and owners and require more out of them. We must support infrastructure around such buildings which must include youth centers, accessible transportation, green spaces for body, mind spirit and mixed housing. which blends residents who are retirees with single mom families for instance. District 16 and the East side in general has lots of land to develop and grow. With that, we have the right, responsibility and ability to think before we build. We have learned from what we did wrong, and this must swiftly be corrected. I am leading in some of those efforts already by introducing Eastside residents to the Bayview model off West Washington for instance.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Rick Rose (D16): Once again it is about resources and accessibility to those resources that are specific to the specific needs of those currently unhoused residents of our county and the East side specifically where most of these solutions are unfolding. As such, I have ongoing conversations with my City alders and Village leaders such as Sabrina, Derek and Janel as well as JP from Burke. I volunteer with Lasagna Love where I monthly deliver lasagnas to these residents which allows me to have conversations with them and hear and understand their specific needs. We are working on plans to partner with those who want to rent and own their homes, which remains an American dream overall. Again, equity in pay and reforms in justice and employment must happen now.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Rick Rose (D16): I have lived in Osaka, Japan, NYC an frequented SF in my formative years and learned about non-vehicle owners and drivers. Those successful models “drive” the work I am doing in public transportation as well as trail system creation and improvement. I also lived in LA as they began to address these issues and participated in the growth of better mobility options. We are ahead in some ways here in Dane with better than decent biking and walking pathways. However as the County and City grow, we must think AHEAD of that growth and plan the BEST pathways between residences, workplaces and areas for basic needs (like shopping, restaurants, health centers, etc.). It’s all about planning. Many American cities and counties populations shift every 5 years by 50%. We must anticipate those shifts. Additionally, the mental health crisis we face here is lessened with options like biking and walking. Pollution is lessened. I am a huge advocate in these matters. Of note, Madison and the WI DOT are doing good work in transportation development currently. I continue to speak for the residents I represent AND the County residents in general at planning sessions and other meetings where improvements are discussed. We must be nimble and responsive.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Rick Rose (D16): Engagement is key. Understanding how to make change and who is responsible for change: county, city, local government. Connecting residents with those voices who can support them is key. I ran my last term with that in mind and it is a big part of my current run. I was asked by Chair Miles to reinvigorate the Engage Dane program which addresses these matters. I have meet with City and village representatives on how to better connect the initiatives we have on the government side with the true needs and desires of those with lived experience. Models like mentioned here are key to that process. It must go both ways.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Dan Blazewicz (D17): District 17

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Dan Blazewicz (D17): The housing affordability crisis in Dane County is broadly a function of too little housing stock at all levels of affordability. The County should do what it can to encourage smart development of all types to meet the needs of our fast growing population. While I am unsure about the exact amount, I do think that includes issuing an Affordable Housing Bond to support the development of affordable housing units.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Dan Blazewicz (D17): Social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing are all creative ways to address the housing crisis. The County should continue to encourage these ideas and some funds of any Affordable Housing Bond could be earmarked specifically for that purpose.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Dan Blazewicz (D17): Any one of our neighbors could be someone with low income. This is why it is so important that we grow our housing stock at all affordability levels. So yes, I absolutely support building new affordable housing in my district. It is clear that we need more density and the best place for that density is along transit routes.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Dan Blazewicz (D17): There are lots of ideas out there that have proven successful, many of which I have only a passing familiarity with, but one idea that targets the “hard” cases would be something like the supportive housing program administered by the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Dan Blazewicz (D17): A regional transit authority would be great, but with state politics the way they are now, that card is off the table. With regard to public transit, making sure we focus our density development along transit routes is key. Building large apartment complexes away from transit and amenities doesn’t make sense. In terms of biking and walking, creating safer and easier ways to navigate between areas bound by highways is critical. Every community in Dane County is going to have different needs when it comes to transportation and that will have to be taken into account.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Dan Blazewicz (D17): This too could be promoted through Affordable Housing Bond allocation. I’m not sure all of the options that are available to Dane County beyond that, but if these ideas have a proven track record of improving peoples lives, they should be explored.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Andrea Andrews (D20): District 20

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Andrea Andrews (D20): I believe that addressing the housing crisis is a critical responsibility of the county government. The statistics you’ve provided clearly indicate the urgent need for action to provide affordable housing options for our residents, particularly those who are extremely cost-burdened. The County’s role in addressing this crisis is multi-faceted. It involves collaborating with local governments, nonprofits, developers, and community stakeholders to implement a comprehensive strategy that includes increasing affordable housing stock, preserving existing affordable units, providing rental assistance, and addressing barriers to housing access. Regarding the proposal to issue an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million, I would carefully consider its potential impact and feasibility. While I am supportive of initiatives to increase affordable housing, I would want to ensure that the bond issuance aligns with our long-term goals, financial capabilities, and the needs of our community. I would also want to explore alternative funding sources and ensure transparency and accountability in the use of public funds. Ultimately, my decision would be guided by thorough analysis, input from constituents and experts, and a commitment to finding sustainable solutions to address the housing crisis in Dane County.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Andrea Andrews (D20): Ensuring the long-term affordability of housing developments funded by the County is crucial to addressing our community’s housing needs sustainably. While the 30-year affordability period requirement is a step in the right direction, we must explore ways to extend affordability beyond this timeframe to provide stability and security for residents. Dane County can explore amending its affordable housing development fund policies to require or incentivize longer affordability periods. This could involve extending the affordability requirement beyond 30 years or implementing permanent affordability mandates for certain types of developments. The County could offer financial incentives or bonuses to developers who commit to longer affordability periods. This might include additional funding, tax incentives, or reduced permitting fees for projects that agree to maintain affordable rents for an extended duration. Collaborating with nonprofits and community organizations that specialize in long-term affordable housing models, such as community land trusts or cooperative housing, can provide valuable expertise and resources. Dane County can advocate for policy changes at the state and federal levels that support long-term affordability in housing developments. This might include advocating for funding programs, tax incentives, or regulatory reforms that encourage or require extended affordability periods. These proactive steps can ensure that Dane County investments in affordable housing have a lasting impact on the well being of our residents and the stability of our communities.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Andrea Andrews (D20): There are very few affordable housing alternatives for my district. Some of the municipalities have trailer parks and low income housing but the lists are very long to getting accepted. I 100% support building new affordable housing choices for low-income people in my district. With District 20 being very rural, there is a lot of farm land that is being sold to developers to build upon. I am looking forward to working with municipalities in my district to help facilitate more of this type of housing.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Andrea Andrews (D20): Implementing a Housing First approach, which prioritizes providing permanent housing to individuals experiencing homelessness without preconditions or barriers to entry. This approach is proven to be effective in helping individuals stabilize their lives and access the support they need. Investing in permanent supportive housing programs that combine affordable housing with wraparound support services such as mental health counseling, substance abuse treatment, and job training. Expanding tenant-based rental assistance programs that provide rental subsidies and support services to individuals experiencing homelessness, allowing them to secure housing in the private rental market. Implementing prevention and diversion programs to help individuals at risk of homelessness avoid entering the shelter system in the first place. Ensuring that individuals transitioning from homelessness to permanent housing have access to ongoing support services to help them maintain their housing stability. Collaborating with local governments, nonprofit organizations, service providers, and community members to develop a coordinated approach to addressing homelessness and implementing permanent housing solutions.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Andrea Andrews (D20): Dane County should prioritize financial support for public transit systems to improve accessibility, frequency, and coverage. This could involve increasing funding for existing bus routes, expanding service to underserved areas, and investing in alternative transit options such as paratransit services for individuals with disabilities. I am a big advocate for a more biking paths and believe that commuting to work from communities further away from Madison should also be looked into. Investing in bike lanes, sidewalks, and pedestrian-friendly infrastructure to make walking and biking safer and more convenient for residents. This includes improving connectivity between neighborhoods, schools, workplaces, and other key destinations to encourage active transportation. Ensuring that transportation planning and funding decisions prioritize equity and accessibility for all residents, especially those who rely on public transit or active transportation options. This may involve conducting equity assessments of transportation projects and implementing strategies to address disparities in access to transportation services. Exploring innovative transit solutions, such as on-demand ride-sharing services, flexible transit routes, and fare subsidy programs, to meet the diverse needs of non-drivers in Dane County. Also by supporting initiatives to promote sustainable transportation options, such as electric buses, bike-sharing programs, and carpooling incentives, to reduce traffic congestion, improve air quality, and mitigate the environmental impact of transportation.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Andrea Andrews (D20): Encouraging the establishment of tenant advisory boards within affordable housing developments, where residents can collectively voice their concerns, provide feedback, and participate in decision-making processes related to housing management, maintenance, and policies. Advocating for leases that explicitly allow for tenant collective bargaining rights, empowering residents to negotiate with landlords or property management companies on issues such as rent increases, lease terms, maintenance standards, and tenant rights. Supporting the creation and expansion of limited equity housing cooperatives, where residents collectively own and govern their housing units, ensuring long-term affordability and resident control over decision-making processes. Advocating for policies and funding mechanisms that prioritize and incentivize resident control models of affordable housing, such as grants, loans, and tax incentives for cooperative housing developments or tenant-driven initiatives. By taking proactive steps to promote resident control of affordable housing, Dane County can empower residents to have a meaningful voice in shaping the future of their housing communities, fostering greater equity, democracy, and sustainability in our housing system.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Chuck Erickson (D23): District 23

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Chuck Erickson (D23): I think the County’s role is to continue with our affordable housing fund and increase the amount as much as possible. We have supported funding for housing for veterans and now in the 2024 budget, for farm workers. Five years ago, I was able to secure $1.3 million of capital funding for the Bayview Foundation for their redevelopment, and this year I secured $1 million of ARPA funding for the Bayview Community Center. I may support ‘affordable housing bonds’ but I would need to hear more about such a proposal and the amount.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Chuck Erickson (D23): I would need to confirm but my understanding is that the projects that Dane County has funded are long-term affordable.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Chuck Erickson (D23): As I stated in a previous question, people with low incomes live in Bayview Foundation housing, which is in the Triangle Neighborhood. Additionally low income people live in the City of Madison CDA housing which is also located in the Triangle. Additionally there is more low income and affordable housing in the sourthern part of my district, in South Madison.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Chuck Erickson (D23): Again, provide more funding for low income housing that would help lower income citizens. The number of residents at Bayview will increase by 80%. Some of these additional residents are from the City’s homeless list.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Chuck Erickson (D23): I have always supported mass transit. We were able to get an RTA (Regional Transit Authority), which could have provided additional funding to start commuter rail. But Gov. Walker eliminated it. I would have also supported increasing the County’s sales tax to fund commuter rail. I want the State to use some of its budget surplus to fund mass transit for Dane and Milwaukee counties. During my 22 years of being on the County Board, I have initiated and supported multiple bike and pedestrian trails, and will continue to do so.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Chuck Erickson (D23): With the Bayview redevelopment, no current residents will be displaced and during the entire process, residents were included in the design process. Bayview should not only be a model for low income housing in Dane County but throughout the country.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Sarah Smith (D24): District 24

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Sarah Smith (D24): As a County, we have made an effort to support new housing and more affordable housing across the county. Access to housing is critical, so our support must continue through investments, zoning changes, and other creative solutions that create sufficient housing units that more people can afford.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Sarah Smith (D24): Housing is inaccessible if it’s unaffordable. It’s important that as a county, we do what we can to ensure that our investments in affordable housing continue to benefit the community for as long as possible into the future.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Sarah Smith (D24): Affordable housing should be in every part of our communities

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Sarah Smith (D24): I have always supported and pursued strategies for housing-first approaches to homelessness. As I’ve researched housing for particularly unhoused parenting minors- a group unserved in Dane County- it’s been clear that we need a more supportive state legislature to remove barriers to public, community housing and to reduce state restrictions on local government.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Sarah Smith (D24): Dane County’s communities need more sidewalks, bike lanes, walkable neighborhoods, and expansive bus systems. Municipalities are responsible for their neighborhood streets and infrastructure so the county can’t play much of a role in that area.

Dane County can, and has, expanded long-distance bike trails through the communities, parks, and green spaces of the county. I will always support these projects that encourage outdoor recreation and non-car transportation.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Sarah Smith (D24): NA

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Kierstin Huelsemann (D27): District 27

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Kierstin Huelsemann (D27): As someone who’s family experienced years of income and housing instability I know first hand how hard finding affordable housing is in Dane County. Our family was fortunate to become homeowners through the Habitat For Humanity Program. In my first term I have supported increases to our Affordable Housing Fund, as well as our Fair Chance Housing Fund. I believe we need more partnerships throughout Dane County to get more creative to address the Affordable Housing crisis too many families and individuals face in our county.

I also have represented the Health and Human Needs committee on the DCHA Board during my first term. As a member of the DCHA Board, I’m very interested in ways the housing authority can use its unique statutory tools to help us address our housing shortage for extremely low income people. I support using bonding to create new housing, I am also acutely aware of the need for more administrative staff for DCHA and the need to support operating expenses like property management and maintenance. Which will take more funding from various sources and partnerships as well.

In my second term I will work to continue to advocate for expanding these programs and partnerships. I also believe that this should not only include affordable rental units, but home ownership as well, to address the equity gaps all too prevalent in our county.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Kierstin Huelsemann (D27): As I stated in my previous answer, I think we need to look at how we can partner with different stakeholders to address this issue. Increasing funding and partnerships is key. Partnering with Developers as well as non profits, contractors, and so on. As well as partnerships with municipalities, state and national elected representatives, to not only increase funding, but to address policy as well. As a supervisor this can be achieved by setting up meetings and doing personal outreach to the various stakeholders. It means advocating for existing committees, subcommittes, boards, and commissions working to address these issues to hold public hearings to get input on partnership ideas. It means proposing policy and/or funding to expand partnerships or strategies. As well as using our voice to advocate with state and federal representives by having meetings, writing letters, what have you. All of which I hope to continue to work with my collegues on the Dane County Board to do.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Kierstin Huelsemann (D27): My district is made up of many low or lower income areas and historically reclined neighborhoods. District 27 is the northern part of Fitchburg that borders Madison. This includes the King James Way Neighborhood, parts of the Traceway drive area, the Southdale Neighborhood, and I personally live in the Allied Drive/Dunns Marsh Neighborhood, that are a part of Fitchburg. These areas have many “Natrual Occuring Affordable Housing” rental units, as well as subsidized. There isn’t much for undeveloped land in my district, and all fall to the jurisdiction of Fitchburg. I do support the development of more affordable housing where space is or becomes available, as well as the rehabilitation of current existing housing. I also support more partnerships with organizations like Habitat for Humanity, Project Home, and others looking at increasing affordable home ownership in my district. Prioritizing programs that provide opportunities for residents already living here, not displacing them, is also important to me as well.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Kierstin Huelsemann (D27): I have supported the hotels to housing initiatives during my first term, along with other similar programs. Unfortunately this, and other programs the county has supported were facilitated with covid relief funding that is now coming to an end. We need to look at other funding avenues, and advocate for more from the national and state levels to continue these programs and look at creating more.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Kierstin Huelsemann (D27): In Dane County, we’ve been limited with regional transit because of state law. I will continue to advocate for changing that legislation so that we can do more.

In the meantime I will continue to advocate for partnerships with municipalities to increase public transit options where and how we can. For instance, I have supported funding for bike infustructure throughout Dane County, and will continue to do so. I will also work to increase the reach of low income bus passes, and options for people facing limitations due to ability related barriers. I also continue to support efforts to bring high speed rail to our area, connecting Dane County with major hubs between Chicago, Milwaukee, and beyond

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Kierstin Huelsemann (D27): The right to be involved tenant orgs is a protected class in Dane County’s fair housing ordinance, which so many aren’t aware of. I think more public education on tenants rights, and especially this sort of organizing, needs to be done.

top of page

Which district are you running for?

Loreen Gage (D36): District 36

According to the 2019 Dane County Housing Needs Assessment, about 13,050 low-income renters and 3,490 low-income homeowners in Dane County are extremely cost-burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on housing. The report also indicates that 10,812 affordable housing units are needed in Dane County right now simply to meet the needs of current “extremely low-income” renters with incomes below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). What do you think the County’s role is in addressing this housing crisis? Would you support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units in the next 10 years?

Loreen Gage (D36): I fully support the Dane County Housing Authority issuing an Affordable Housing Bond of at least $350 million to fund the development of at least 4,000 additional affordable housing units over the next 10 years. In addition to funding more affordable housing, I believe it is important to include resources within these units to address social services issues such as employment, food insecurity, transportation, financial literacy, home-buying classes, and education resources. It is also crucial to support our youth by connecting them to youth groups and park and recreation programs. Allocating funding to support residents and promote housing stability is essential in creating a thriving community.

Affordable housing projects that are subsidized by Dane County’s Affordable Housing Development Fund have a 30-year affordability period requirement, meaning they must maintain affordable rents for a minimum of 30 years, but are not required to maintain affordable rents after 30 years. Some affordable housing models, such as social housing, community land trusts, and cooperative housing, commit to permanently affordable housing as part of their mission, and some funders prioritize, incentivize, or require long-term affordability. What actions should Dane County take, if any, to support long-term affordability periods for developments funded by the County?

Loreen Gage (D36): A key action that Dane County should take is to establish and enforce regulatory agreements with developers that are utilizing county funds, and outline the terms of affordability, including income limits, rent levels, and length of affordability requirements. Also, the county could provide additional financial incentives or tax credits to developers who commit to long-term affordability periods that exceed 30 years. I think it is also important for the county to have oversight and regularly monitor and enforce compliance with affordability requirements to ensure that developments remain affordable over time. It is also important to have ongoing engagement with community stakeholders and residents to gather input and feedback on affordable housing policies.

Where do people with low incomes live in your district? Do you support building new housing that is affordable for low-income people in your district? If so, where do you think it could be built in your district?

Loreen Gage (D36): In Cottage Grove we have a newly built 100 unit 1-3 bedroom affordable apartments. The units in the building serve a mix of incomes between 30 and 80% of the area median income in Dane County. The apartments converts to an annual salary of about $21,000 per year to $56,000 per year for one person and slightly more for larger families. I definitely would support more housing in my district provided that we have a social services component embedded. I am unsure of where we can build more units at this time, but that I would prioritize this if I am elected.

What are your ideas for how Dane County can create permanent housing solutions for single unsheltered individuals and individuals who are currently using the men’s and women’s shelters in Dane County?

Loreen Gage (D36): I believe it is crucial to prioritize relocating all unsheltered families into permanent housing, irrespective of their family size. Our focus should be on transitioning individuals and families from temporary housing solutions to stable and permanent housing options. We should continue to manage the housing list to ensure these individuals are moving through the process in a timely manner. Lastly, we should foster dialogue with leaders of the shelters to understand the needs of the people experiencing homelessness and determine better solutions and strategies to eradicate the situation.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 30-40% of Dane County residents are non-drivers. This includes “aging adults; students; low-income individuals; those with physical, sensory, mental or intellectual/developmental disabilities; and those who prefer not to drive, are unlicensed or have limited access to a vehicle.” How do you think Dane County can better serve this population? What will you do to foster Dane County’s financial support for transit, biking, and walking? What other specific initiatives would you propose to support transportation options for non-drivers over the next 5 years?

Loreen Gage (D36): Transportation is an essential service, and it is imperative that the county allocates additional funding to support individuals who do not drive. Engaging stakeholders and community members who are directly impacted by transportation issues in these discussions is vital to gaining a better understanding of their needs and ensuring that any proposed solutions are inclusive and effective. Another potential solution is to provide e-bikes at a discounted rate to individuals in need. I would support funding to provide more e-bikes in my district, if this could alleviate some of the concerns surrounding transportation.

Resident control of housing means that all residents in a building or complex, particularly those most impacted by housing injustice, are able to collectively and democratically make decisions affecting how their housing is operated. Examples of resident control of housing range from tenant advisory boards and leases that specifically allow for tenant collective bargaining, to limited equity housing cooperatives and tenement syndicates. What actions, if any, do you believe that Dane County should take to promote resident control of affordable housing?

Loreen Gage (D36): We can focus on creating resident-led councils and provide resources and financial support for residents to participate in decision-making processes regarding affordable housing policies and programs. We also can provide opportunities for residents to participate on panels and boards related to housing.

We should offer opportunities for resident training and education on property management and maintenance to empower residents. The county board can implement policies that prioritize resident ownership and involvement in affordable housing developments. Lastly, allow residents to collaborate with community organizations and stakeholders to ensure that residents have a voice.

top of page